| cheapbag214s |
 Posted: Thu 20:48, 26 Sep 2013 Post subject: overtly sexual” |
|
| Here is just a sample of what critics are saying about the film adaptation:Roger Ebert (Chicago Sun-Times): “Let’s say you know the novel,[url=http://www.tinfoti.com]Cheap Christian Louboutin[/url], you agree with Ayn Rand, you’re an objectivist or a libertarian, and you’ve been waiting eagerly for this movie. Man, are you going to get a letdown.”Peter Travers (Rolling Stone): “Ayn Rand’s monumental 1,168-page, 1957 novel gets the low-budget, no-talent treatment and sits there flapping on screen like a bludgeoned seal.”(More on TIME.com: See how the Atlas Shrugged movie came to be)Peter Debrudge (Variety): “Part one of a trilogy that may never see completion, this hasty,[url=http://www.tinfoti.com]Christian Louboutin Outlet[/url], low-budget adaptation would have Ayn Rand spinning in her grave.”Bill Goodykoontz (Arizona Republic): ”The acting is so poor and the story so badly told that the viewer’s feelings about Rand’s novel — an epic ode to free-market fundamentalism — are almost immaterial (though if you’re a devoted fan,[url=http://www.tinfoti.com]Christian Louboutin Men[/url], you’ll perhaps be more forgiving).”Unsurprisingly, Goodykoontz’ last note has so far turned out to be widely true. Die-hard fans of Objectivism have managed to overlook things like a slow plot, bad acting and a low-budget and are praising Atlas Shrugged: Part 1 to the high heavens.Though it should be noted that despite some of the audience reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes giving the movie five stars, some also admit they haven’t actually, you know, seen it yet. Ebert also tweeted that, “As I write,[url=http://www.tinfoti.com]Christian Louboutin Sale[/url], ‘Atlas Shrugged’ has a ★★★★ rating from my readers. The film has not yet been seen publicly”.(More on TIME.com: See what Ayn Rand would have done about the Bush administration)Sorry, Old Spice Guy: India Bans Sexy Deodorant CommercialsEmailPrintShareFacebookTwitterTumblrLinkedInStumbleUponRedditDiggMixxDeliciousGoogle+Comment Follow @timenewsfeedTelevision broadcasters in India were ordered to change “overtly sexual” deodorant ads featuring scantily clad men and women in racy storylines — or take them off the air within five days.If India’s Information and Broadcasting Ministry has its way, ads like the one above would be on their way out.On Thursday, the ministry said in a statement the sexually suggestive ads violate India’s advertising code, which states “cable operators should ensure that the portrayal of the female form… is tasteful and aesthetic and within the well established norms of good taste and decency.”It said that the adverts portraying women “lustily hankering after men under the influence of such deodorants,” offended “good taste and decency,” by “tickling libidinous male instincts.”(MORE: Is advertising in schools going too far?)Wild Stone, Addiction Deo, Set Wet Zatak, Denver Deo and Axe are some of the brands affected, but the BBC reports none of the companies named by the ministry have responded, or are likely to respond in public to the order because of the sensitivities surrounding the issue.Alan Collaco, Secretary General of the Advertising Standards Council of India, a voluntary industry self-regulation group, says while complaints for deodorant ads have been high over the past two years, in many cases the advertising is not objectionable. “Any visual that is not likely to cause grave or widespread offense is not a cause of concern. Most of these deodorant ads are played after 11pm on TV, outside family viewing timing,” he says in a statement on the ASCI website.While it remains to be seen what action the ministry will take should networks defy the order, last year the ministry suspended Fashion TV (FTV) for 10 days after the channel featured topless models. (Via BBC)(PHOTOS: A Brief History of Movie Product Placement)Sorry, Pac-10: How TV Dreams Kept the Big 12 AliveCarson Ganci/First Light/CorbisEmailPrintShareFacebookTwitterTumblrLinkedInStumbleUponRedditDiggMixxDeliciousGoogle+Comment Follow @timenewsfeedThe Big 12 is now the Big Ten. The Big Ten is now the Big 12. What’s yet |
|
