www.ligahordy.fora.pl
Horde League
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
www.ligahordy.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Informacje/information
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Newsy
----------------
Ogłoszenia/ Notice
Informacje/information
Ogólne
----------------
Zasady/Rulez
Horde League
Kantyna
Free Talk
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Sun 16:48, 04 Aug 2013
Post subject: Trayvon Martin, Cont._4
cautious and prudent person" would do under the same circumstances. Even if there are no other witnesses, the court will weigh Defendant's testimony against this standard; that is, the court will look to the surrounding facts to determine whether the Defendant acted rationally. Here's where it gets interesting for the Zimmerman case. As has been pointed out by you and others, the first standard--for a passive innocent--does not require retreat. What I haven't seen yet in these parts** is the fact that the third standard--for an initial-aggressor--actually does require retreat. That is, a person who initially provokes a physical encounter must exhaust "every reasonable means to escape such danger" before resorting to deadly force. § 776.041(2)(a).Indeed:The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who: (1) Is attempting to commit, committing,
prada outlet
, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or (2) Initially
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin