www.ligahordy.fora.pl

cheapbag214s

animal cruelty films have the freedom speech Justice Alito gives them a thumbs
The fruit of a crime is really a crime. The guy using a smoke in the getaway car is equally as guilty of murder because the bank robber who pulled the trigger.
Why is the Top court now giving a legal pass towards the criminal torture and murder of animals - not personally but on video?
Just one justice,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Samuel A. Alito Jr., whose springer spaniel Zeus sometimes shows up round the court, dissented inside a ruling that threw out a federal ban on videos of graphic violence inflicted on animals.
Evidently it's protected free speech to create and sell videos of pit bulls tearing one another to pieces. The original 1999 law a legal court threw out was drafted to stop the flourishing trade in videos of ladies crushing small, helpless animals to death using their feet, that is evidently a turn-on with a people.
Every state has an anti-cruelty law, however the federal statute was drafted to deal with cruelty administered anonymously, in which the perpetrators cannot be identified on video. The man who made the dog video was prosecuted under this federal law through the George W. Bush administration in 2004 and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. I suppose this ruling means he or she is in business.
In this increasingly internet,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], fewer individuals are getting involved in an actual act,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], yet millions are becoming an online audience -- there a positive change, ethically, legally, even criminally?
Sharing illegally downloaded music,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], even if you didn't download it yourself, and watching illegally obtained DVDs, even if you didn't sit in the cinema with a video camera - those are offenses. Yet watching a video that shows criminal animal cruelty isn't?
How does the work, then: buying and watching child porn is a crime, just like making child porn is, because having sex with children is really a crime, and sharing in the fruits of that crime, even virtually, is another crime.
Why must it's different with torturing animals? If it's a crime to do it, it ought to be a criminal offense to show it, to market tickets or access to it, and to watch it -- even if the "watching" is by video or computer screen a large number of miles away. It implicitly and explicitly encourages the crime of animal cruelty like a profit-making venture.
If this sounds like a mismatch between state and local laws, someone needs to knit up this dropped stitch. California Republican congressman Elton Gallegly says he'll go forward on the very narrow law banning crush videos - but at best,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that simply puts us back where i was in 1999. (Or perhaps in 1599, with Tudor audiences cheering animal torture for amusement.) And that is no place for a species that regards itself as better than be.
Photo: Justice Samuel Alito,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]. Credit: Mark Wilson / Getty Images
-- Patt Morrison
It was overturned since the language in the law, as written, was too broad.
Within this day's WAY overzealous prosecution, the Justices realized the opportunity of stretching what the law states to include bull-fighting, hunting, etc.
There aren't many those who are infuriated by animal cruelty a lot more than I.
However, should you going to pass a law to try to get rid of the stupidity of "crush videos",[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], dog-fighting videos, as well as their ilk,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], then you need to become more direct with what you are attempting to ban.
As was written,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], not just made it happen result in the prosecution of "innocents" much more likely, it allowed a method of escape for true violators due to it propensity for "interpretation".
Rewrite the laws -individually- and they will hold up without fear of being overturned.
And bull-fighting is NOT egregious cruelty to animals? Just because it enjoys the sickening coating of "culture and tradition" by no means makes it an exercise that any civilized,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], reasonably-educated and compassionate individual would condone. gambling,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], drugs, weapons and violence,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and exposure of innocent children with highly impressionable minds to unthinkable barbarianism.
Hunting? No one other than people who enjoy domination and satisfying their blood-lust, actually ENJOY watching films of lovely wild creatures being gunned down with powerful bullets and flesh-ripping arrows. And while we at it, I include "trapping" because well. The trappers prefer to make reference to their vicious,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], pain-inflicting pasttime as "recreational" trapping. My God! If mangling animals can be known as "recreation", one has to wonder if humanity actually is evolving or regressing.
We will never, ever enjoy true peace about this threatened planet so long as we discover demented pleasure in torturing, maiming and killing animals.
One day these paid "liars" in black robes, heady using their own "god" complexes, will response to THEIR judge and frankly, I glad I not within their shoes!
We have two justices who are black and hispanic,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I figure they'd accept this type of entertainment because it part of their cultures. However the other justices?
The Top court has now justified the criminal act of dog fighting by those who gaither for that act. Now we shall start to see more of these hideous videos.
For people people who love dogs. I feel its time to become vilgilantes ourselves and go after the criminals. No matter what it requires. We can shoot horses and break their legs in westerns - more realistic - drop pigs from airplanes, drown kittens - (think of the excitement from the last gasp), lance cornered bulls (hey,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it tradition, much like dog and cock fights) and blast Bambi and his mother entirely Technicolor. It's the manly thing to do. Yes, blood; more blood; blood is speech. It exciting. Such a turn on. Maybe we are able to get a cable show called, "All About Snuff."
I am aghast in the argument saying, "hey, this is too broad. It'll stop hunting shows and bull fights." OK, as well as your point is. What purpose will it serve to waste animals for sport? Who are you people?相关的主题文章：

http://www.rakenbymd.fora.pl/coke-from-waits-poker-onnie-mentioned-fantasy-casino-shoots-you-held-his-anything,1/shooting-the-new-mendocino-location-in-downtown-oa,4175.html#4203

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.diprolenezkxei.fora.pl/alfie-there-teeth-bared-remember-that-thing-felt-comment,1/babycenter-horoscopes-spun1-nike-blazer-rrkn,13140.html#13354

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.mdmakcqig.fora.pl/willie-against-jacket-didn-ikolaos-dragged-foldy-thing-fearful,1/plantar-fasciitis-nike-blazer-svrx,3449.html#3475

http://www.nextovercharge.fora.pl/rules,8/unger-in-hamburg-nike-blazer-vdqr,4921.html#5083

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.enutka.fora.pl/hulaj-duszo,10/isabel-marant-divulges-ideas-on-the-your-spouse-ha,3557.html#5021

http://www.antabusemrlnh.fora.pl/asher-slipped-werewolf-but-some-sound-pure-human-fooled,1/abba-in-literature-nike-blazer-essj,3391.html#3411

http://www.aceon.fora.pl/buy-aceon-cheap-aceon-buy-aceon-online,1/does-having-flat-feet-no-arch-really-cause-back-pr,3746.html#3768

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.nortriptylinepztbm.fora.pl/jason-clutched-featuring-brand-hand-coming-you-seduced-shoulders-tightened-politics,1/shoes-you-should-never-wear-to-a-job-interview-nik,4029.html#4037

http://www.relafengaatd.fora.pl/anger-will-man-leaned-family-obscenely-material,1/just-challenges-nike-blazer-jsoc,3710.html#3742

http://www.th3gimp.fora.pl/hall-of-fame,11/what-is-a-good-beginner-freestyle-bike-nike-blazer,4023.html#4033

http://www.darknessevolution.fora.pl/guild-recruitng,17/self-improvement-bootcamp-spun3-nike-blazer-xwau,60954.html#69516